Hi Art:


You ask three questions:

A)  Does a Class B or better transformer insulation system operating
    at 65 C rise or more need to be UL 1446 Recognized to be qualified
    for the NRTL mark?

    In my opinion, regardless of the standard, if the transformer or 
    end-product is certified by UL, the transformer insulation system 
    will need to be certified in accordance with UL 1446.  This is 
    the UL way.

    If the transfomer or end-product is certified by any other NRTL,
    then the transformer need only be made with Class B or better 
    insulating components.

B)  Reading of the standard?

    While there is no specific deviation associated with Sub-clause 
    2.2.2, there is a COMPONENT deviation associated with Sub-clause
    1.5.1 which invokes Annex P.2.  So either UL 1446 or CAN/CSA C22.2, 
    No. 0 applies.

    A third-party certification house could apply either UL 1446 or 
    CAN/CSA C22.2, No. 0 in addition to component specs.  This would 
    have to be negotiated with the certification house (insofar as 
    the certification house is willing to negotiate).

    To my knowledge, CAN/CSA C22.2, No. 0 does not require insulations
    to be tested as a system.

C)  Correct interpretation?

    Depends.  Depends on who gets to make the final decision as to 
    the "correct" interpretation.  If you are the one to decide, then
    I believe you have a "correct" interpretation.  If you are dealing
    with a third-party certifier, then it is likely that they will be
    the ones to decide and they would have the "correct" interpretation.

>From a safety point of view, the objective is to have an insulation 
system rated for the temperatures, voltages, and mechanical strengths
found in the transformer.

UL 1449 presumes long-term chemical interactions among various insulating 
materials when operated at high temperature and in intimate contact with 
copper wire and for extend periods of time.  Unfortunately, it is 
difficult to predict if the particular insulations in your transformer
could incur chemical deterioration.

On the other hand, no other safety standards or third-party certification
houses, including CSA, have such requirements.  This implies the long-
term, high-temperature deterioration is not of sufficient importance that
other certification houses need test for it.  


Best regards,
Rich

Hewlett-Packard Company
San Diego, California


Reply via email to