Hi Peter & Tania, "Require? No. Will they? Yes,". I'm intrigued. When will this breakover occur? Also, I'm curious. How is UL, as a NRTL, able to require Listing of any product in any product category? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I feel a NRTL is able to List a product, not require a product to be Listed. I believe that it's the responsibility of a higher power, such as OSHA, the 29CFR series, the National Electric Code or Canadian Electric Code, and/or others to make that call. Or, is there a move afoot to elevate UL's status? :-) I'm just trying to get clarification. Please advise. Best regards, Ron Pickard [email protected] ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: RE: US NRTL required ? Author: "Peter Tarver" <[email protected]> at INTERNET List-Post: [email protected] Date: 9/22/98 11:17 AM Require? No. Will they? Yes, under certain circumstances and certain product categories, like ITE. Laptops for instance. Peter L. Tarver Nortel [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Grant, Tania (Tania) [SMTP:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, September 21, 1998 6:24 PM > > Thank you, Peter, for your clarification. > > You used the past tense below;-- does this mean that NOW UL does require > Listing > when connected to a Class 2 power source????? > > I definitely recall many years ago a CSA engineer telling me that we > need not have submitted a device attached to a CSA Certified power > source, but since he was here already, I went through the process > anyway. > > Tania Grant, Lucent Technologies, Octel Messaging Division > [email protected] > > > ---------- > From: Peter Tarver[SMTP:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, September 21, 1998 1:18 PM > > I just came across some typographical errors. My apologies. > Please refer to the below for corrections in "<<<text>>>". > > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tarver, Peter [MPK:4N02:EXCH] > Sent: Monday, September 21, 1998 9:40 AM > > In paragraph 1 - > > For a long time, UL (and I believe CSA) thought any > device deriving power from a Class 2 source > <<<did not need>> listing. > > In paragraph 4 - > > > Table SA12.1 indicates that single alkaline-<<<manganese>>> > dioxide D cells, > > nickel-cadmium AA, C and D cells are all capable of delivering > greater than > > 8A at one minute of loading. I find this strange, but my > discussions with > > Randy Ivans indicate that there is data to support these > claims. --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
--------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
