Thank you, Peter, for your clarification.
You used the past tense below;-- does this mean that NOW UL does require
Listing
when connected to a Class 2 power source?????
I definitely recall many years ago a CSA engineer telling me that we
need not have submitted a device attached to a CSA Certified power
source, but since he was here already, I went through the process
anyway.
Tania Grant, Lucent Technologies, Octel Messaging Division
[email protected]
----------
From: Peter Tarver[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 1998 1:18 PM
To: PSTC - articles
Subject: RE: US NRTL required ?
I just came across some typographical errors. My apologies.
Please refer
to the below for corrections in "<<<text>>>".
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Tarver, Peter [MPK:4N02:EXCH]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 1998 9:40 AM
In paragraph 1 -
For a long time, UL (and I believe CSA) thought any
device deriving
power
from a Class 2 source<<<did not need>> listing.
In paragraph 4 -
> Table SA12.1 indicates that single alkaline-<<<manganese>>>
dioxide D
> cells,
> nickel-cadmium AA, C and D cells are all capable of delivering
greater
> than
> 8A at one minute of loading. I find this strange, but my
discussions with
> Randy Ivans indicate that there is data to support these
claims.
>
---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).
---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).
