I have also heard this, but haven't seen any evidence in our 3m weather
protected site.  This site, with shingled roofing and vinyl siding has never
had a deviation wider than 1.5 dB in NSA measurements in its 8 years of use.

Best Regards,

Mike Fahrion
[email protected]



>Related to the issue of reflections on an OATS is contaminants.  I have
>heard from a few sites that have all weather test capabilities, that they
>need to periodically pressure clean their shelters -- 6 dB was suggested as
>a variation due to contaminants.  If the effects of contaminants apply to
>shelters, it seems only logical that the effects of contaminants would
apply
>to other obstructions such as curbs and posts; who knows, maybe even to
>vegetation!  (Anybody pressure clean their trees lately?)
>
>Don Umbdenstock
>
>Sensormatic
>
>
>
>> ----------
>> From: Robert Bonsen[SMTP:[email protected]]
>> Reply To: Robert Bonsen
>> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 1998 9:15 PM
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: ANSI C63.4-- OATS construction issues
>>
>> First of all, expanding the width is a Good Idea. Generally speaking, the
>> larger the ground plane, the better it will approach a "perfect OATS"
and,
>> hence, deliver better performance. This is particularly important for a
>> smaller sized OATS.
>>
>> The minimal size described in CISPR22 is 1m beyond the boundary of EUT
>> (quiet zone) and the largest antenna to be used. The metallic ground
plane
>> must cover the entire area between the EUT and the antenna.
>>
>> The ellipse of 2Rx1.73R (R=test distance) is a recommended obstruction
>> free
>> zone. Buildings, fences etc. qualify as obstructions if they are of a
>> conductive nature. Chances are you will get away with a few hedges etc.
>> within this ellips. The site attenuation measurements will determine
>> whether the site qualifies or not. It is however smart to keep metallic
>> objects outside this ellips.
>>
>> Definitely put the screen on the top of the concrete. Choose wire mesh
>> with
>> a sufficiently small mesh size (smaller than 10% of smallest
>> wavelength-to-be-measured) and solder at the seams of the individual
>> overlapping sheets  every 3-5 inches or so (recommended is 10% of
smallest
>> wavelength but experience has shown that is excessively stringent most of
>> the time).
>>
>> If you cannot bury the power cables or the signal cables run them
>> perpendicular to the measurement axis on top of the ground plane. Make
>> sure
>> to bond these cable to the ground plane since any metal above the
metallic
>> ground plane may influence measurements and, hence, should be present in
>> the same configuration the site attenuation qualification measurements
are
>> done.
>>
>> One additional issue is the ground plane termination into the surrounding
>> earth. In case of an abrupt termination at the edges of the ground plane,
>> eg. in the case of a rooftop OATS, the reflection from the edges of the
>> ground plane may have significant impact on measurements. Even on a very
>> large OATS the reflections from the ground plane edges will show up in
>> measurements, when the edges are not properly terminated. This effect can
>> be significantly reduced by providing a smooth transition between the
>> ground plane and the surrounding earth, eg. by running the mesh wire out
>> beyond the concrete and burrying it in the surrounding dirt and by
>> shoveling up the dirt to the level of the ground plane. Note that
>> reflections from the ground plane terminations do not necessarily
>> disqualify an OATS in the site attenuation measurements. The net effect
>> depends on a variety of factors, including the size of the ground plane
>> and
>> the measurement range layout.
>>
>> Sometimes an OATS does not meet site attenuation requirements, which
>> happens more often in the case of a smaller OATS than with larger ones.
By
>> doing proper diagnostic measurements it is possible to indicate where
>> reflections due to site imperfectness or obstructions are originating
from
>> and eliminate the problem.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Robert Bonsen
>> EMC facility consultant
>>
>> Robert Bonsen
>> Principal Consultant
>> Orion Scientific
>> email: [email protected]
>> URL:   http://www.orionscientific.com
>> phone: (512) 347 7393; FAX: (512) 328 9240
>>
>>
>> ---------
>> This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
>> To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
>> with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
>> quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
>> [email protected], [email protected], or
>> [email protected] (the list administrators).
>>
>
>---------
>This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
>To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
>with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
>quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
>[email protected], [email protected], or
>[email protected] (the list administrators).
>


---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to