I forgot to mention one very important study. The American Physical Society
(202-662-8700) published a statement in April 1995 concerning "Power Line
Fields and Public Health." You may be able to find this one on the web.

> ----------
> From:         WOODS, RICHARD
> Sent:         Friday, June 12, 1998 9:25 AM
> To:   [email protected]; '[email protected]'
> Subject:      RE: 60Hz EM fields
> 
> Chuck, the effects can be broken down into two areas: acute or short term
> effects and chronic or long term effects. Acute effects are fairly well
> known, understood, and documented. The major effect is nerve stimulation
> with the threshold of current density being about 1.2 A/sq m, and the
> threshold of the internal electric field being 6.2 V/m. Current density is
> related to the electric field by the conductivity of the tissue. The best
> book on the technical aspect of nerve stimulation is "Electrical
> Stimulation and Electropathology" by J. Patrick Reilly, Cambridge
> University Press, ISBN 0-521-41791-0.
> 
> Chronic effects are not well understood at all and there is a lot of "junk
> science" and conflicting studies out there. Be careful. After you digest
> the reliable reports, you will discover that if there are chronic effects,
> such as cancer, the fields that cause them are reported to be magnitudes
> lower than those that cause acute effects.
> 
> Richard Woods
> Sensormatic Electronics
> [email protected]
> Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
> Sensormatic.
> 
>       ----------
>       From:   [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]]
>       Reply To:       [email protected]
>       Sent:   Thursday, June 11, 1998 3:26 PM
>       To:     [email protected]
>       Subject:        60Hz EM fields
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       Hi Folks
> 
>       Might someone have some information as to the harmful affects of  60
> Hz
>       magnetic fields of overhead power lines, or where I  might look for
> some
>       information.
> 
>       Thank you and have a great day
> 
>       Chuck
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to