forwarding for [email protected]
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: FW: RE: Brazilian requirements
Author: "Net Connection Corp" <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 9/21/00 9:19 AM
TO: John Radomski
Product Compliance Engineer
Clare Corp.
David Clement
Motorola Inc.
Global Homologation Engineering
FROM: Richard L. Swarz
Net Connection Corp
Hi John and David,
Jim was kind enough to forward these e-mails.
We look forward to address any questions on Brazil
and all other countries South of the US Border.
David, the regulation that you site may be of interest, if you
plan to test in Brazil. We have been successful in avoiding
IN Country Testing by utilizing our Licensed engineers and
Test Reports based primarily on European Standards. Brazil's
"Standards" are currently from the former Telebras
Until 1998 the only phone provider in Brazil.
There are alternative Brazilian Standards that may work equally well in
determining if the Product meets Brazil's regulations.
Awaiting your e-mail / call.
Best regards,
Richard
310 821-0700
310 574-9540 FAX
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Net Connection Corp [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 9:07 AM
To: 'James Linehan'
Subject: RE: RE: Brazilian requirements
Hi Jim,
Many thanks, your kindness is greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Richard
310 821-0700
310 574-9540 FAX
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: James Linehan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 11:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: RE: Brazilian requirements
Richard, FYI........
There may be some business coming your way, I've forwarded your contact
information to each of the gentlemen noted below.
>From: Dave Clark <[email protected]>
>To: "'James Linehan'" <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: Brazilian requirements
>Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:18:30 -0400
>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
>
>James,
>
>I am very interested in the consultant you used. Please forward me their
>contact info.
>
>Dave
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: James Linehan [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 12:36 PM
>To: Clement Dave-LDC009; '[email protected]'; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: Brazilian requirements
>
>
>
>I recently completed a Brazilian compliance effort on a telecom device.
>
>It was handled via a consultant with expertise in South American regulatory
>requirements.
>
>I was required to supply copies of existing test reports ( Part 68, Part
15,
>applicable CTRs, and CB Scheme), electronic photos, and a description of
the
>device and it's normal functionality.
>
>No test samples or testing was required. The information was reviewed and
>processed, and the end result was an ANATEL approval certificate.
>
>If you'd like contact information for the Consultant I used, feel free to
>e-mail me.
>
>At 05:04 PM 9/20/00 -0400, Clement Dave-LDC009 wrote:
>
> >For Terminal Equipment the generic requirments are;
> >
> >Federal Official Gazette - Ordance No. 322 - Net No. 001/92
> >
> >There is also a test procedure - No.225-540-514 "Test Procedures for Data
> >Communications Equipment for Transmission Nominal Speed Up yo 28800
> >Bits/sec"
> >
> >These are published in Portuguese and you will need to have them
>translated.
> >Make sure you get a technical translator. We had a requirement that got
> >translated incorrectly that placed an out of band requirement on voice
band
> >signals.
> >
> >David Clement
> >Motorola Inc.
> >Global Homologation Engineering
> >20 Cabot Blvd.
> >Mansfield, MA 02048
> >
> >P: 508-261-4389
> >F: 508-261-4777
> >E: <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> >Pager:
> >Numeric: 978-545-5452
> >Alpha: <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 1:43 PM
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Brazilian requirements
> >
> >
> >
> >Group,
> >
> >Could you advise me on the Brazilian telecom requirements for interfaces
to
> >be connected to the analog PSTN?
> >I was not able to find any information on this subject in English.
> >
> >Thank you in advance.
> >
> >John Radomski
> >Product Compliance Engineer
> >Clare Corp.
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------
> >This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> >Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> >
> >To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> > [email protected]
> >with the single line:
> > unsubscribe emc-pstc
> >
> >For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> > Jim Bacher: [email protected]
> > Michael Garretson: [email protected]
> >
> >For policy questions, send mail to:
> > Richard Nute: [email protected]
> >
> >
> >-------------------------------------------
> >This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> >Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> >
> >To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> > [email protected]
> >with the single line:
> > unsubscribe emc-pstc
> >
> >For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> > Jim Bacher: [email protected]
> > Michael Garretson: [email protected]
> >
> >For policy questions, send mail to:
> > Richard Nute: [email protected]
> >
>
>Jim Linehan
>Hardware Engineer
>VGSBU
>Cisco Systems Inc.
>300 Apollo Drive
>Chelmsford, MA. 01824
>Phone: (978) 244-5716
>Fax:(978) 244-5908
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
