George, There is no UL60950. Try UL1950, Third Edition.
George george.sparacino%[email protected] on 05/11/2000 11:50:58 AM Please respond to george.sparacino%[email protected] To: emc-pstc%[email protected] cc: (bcc: George Alspaugh/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: Network Card Certification Has anyone seen a copy of UL60950 ? I am unable to find copy (or draft) for review. Thanks, George -----Original Message----- From: Bandele Adepoju [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 8:38 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Network Card Certification You should self declare conformity (DoC) of the card to FCC Class B. The "FCC logo" mentioned by David must be supported on your card with the product model or identification number. Test configuration, in addition to that listed by David below, should include a remote PC hookup for data exchange (or a loopback transceiver) to exercise the LAN port. For US safety, the RJ jacks may, as alternate to what is listed below, be marked with the word "Ethernet" or similar. Clause 6 of the EN60950 or UL1950 standard does not apply to your card. Make sure that the card is listed to the 3rd Edition of UL1950 or UL60950. Preferably that you list the card to UL60950 which went into effect on April 1st of this year. UL1950 expires on April 1st of 2003. Regards, Bandele Jetstream Communications, Inc. [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:26 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Network Card Certification Safety: UL1950 US EN/IEC60950 International FCC CFR 47 Part 15: Class B residential or Class A (industrial) Re: FCC "FCC logo" for Class B is self-certified but you must test in the PC configuration specified in Part 15; EUT includes monitor, keyboard, mouse, serial device and printer. Be sure all items are Class B before you test your card. Class B requires careful circuit layout and component choice for most network technologies. Re: safety If RJ jack, mark the port with the "telephone-banned" logo or print a lengthy message (for data only) near the port. 'For data only' does not translate well into French. david ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Network Card Certification Author: "Dan Mitchell" <SMTP:[email protected]> at ADEMCONET List-Post: [email protected] Date: 5/10/2000 11:54 AM I have a possible project where I will have to get a PC Network Card Safety certified. As it is used in a PC, I would assume that it will fall under UL1950. Since the card does not directly connect to a phone line, (it would go through a server and then to a phone line) I was wondering if Clause 6 Connection to Telecommunication Networks would apply. Additionally, I would like to know what FCC requirements must be met. Any other information would be greatly appreciated. Dan Mitchell Condor DC Power Supplies ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: [email protected] Michael Garretson: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: [email protected] Michael Garretson: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: [email protected] Michael Garretson: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected]Title: RE: Network Card Certification
Has anyone seen a copy of UL60950 ? I am unable to find copy (or draft) for review.
Thanks,
George
-----Original Message-----
From: Bandele Adepoju [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 8:38 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Network Card Certification
You should self declare conformity (DoC) of the card
to FCC Class B. The "FCC logo" mentioned by David
must be supported on your card with the product model
or identification number.
Test configuration, in addition to that listed by
David below, should include a remote PC hookup for
data exchange (or a loopback transceiver) to exercise
the LAN port.
For US safety, the RJ jacks may, as alternate to what
is listed below, be marked with the word "Ethernet"
or similar.
Clause 6 of the EN60950 or UL1950 standard does not
apply to your card. Make sure that the card is listed
to the 3rd Edition of UL1950 or UL60950. Preferably
that you list the card to UL60950 which went into
effect on April 1st of this year. UL1950 expires on
April 1st of 2003.
Regards,
Bandele
Jetstream Communications, Inc.
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:26 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Network Card Certification
Safety:
UL1950 US
EN/IEC60950 International
FCC
CFR 47 Part 15: Class B residential or Class A (industrial)
Re: FCC
"FCC logo" for Class B is self-certified but you must test in the PC
configuration specified in Part 15; EUT includes monitor, keyboard,
mouse, serial device and printer. Be sure all items are Class B
before you test your card.
Class B requires careful circuit layout and component choice for most
network technologies.
Re: safety
If RJ jack, mark the port with the "telephone-banned" logo or print a
lengthy message (for data only) near the port. 'For data only' does
not translate well into French.
david
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Network Card Certification
Author: "Dan Mitchell" <SMTP:[email protected]> at ADEMCONET
Date: 5/10/2000 11:54 AM
I have a possible project where I will have to get a PC Network Card Safety
certified. As it is used in a PC, I would assume that it will fall under
UL1950. Since the card does not directly connect to a phone line, (it
would go through a server and then to a phone line) I was wondering if
Clause 6 Connection to Telecommunication Networks would apply.
Additionally, I would like to know what FCC requirements must be met.
Any other information would be greatly appreciated.
Dan Mitchell
Condor DC Power Supplies
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
