Hi Kaz,

Both IEC60950 3rd Ed & UL60950 3rd Ed define the ROUTINE TEST as you describe, 
however, in note 1,
the key phrase is "specified elsewhere in this standard". In fact, the only 
references for ROUTINE
TEST and Electric Strength put together (REST = Routine Electric Strength Test) 
in this standard can
be found at the following locations:

- Tables 2H(note 2) and 2K(note 2) require REST for Double/Reinforced 
Insulation.
- Clause 2.10.5.3 requires REST for PWBs per Table 2M(note 3).
- Clause 2.10.5.4 requires REST for wound components.
- Tables G.2(note 2)  requires REST for Double/Reinforced Insulation.
- Tables R.1(note 4) and R.2(note 2) provide REST alternatives.

So, it would appear that a ROUTINE TEST description for finished ITE products 
still is not present
in this standard (series). However, as we all undoubtedly have at least one 
third-party mark on our
products here in the US and maybe elsewhere, that third-party has the privilege 
to mandate what
routine tests are required for their mark to be affixed to our products.

Looking forward to some comments/rebuttals.

Best regards,

Ron Pickard
[email protected]




                                                                                
                                           
                    Kazimier_Gawrzyjal@Dell                                     
                                           
                    .com                           To:     
[email protected], [email protected]               
                    Sent by:                       cc:                          
                                           
                    owner-emc-pstc@majordom        Subject:     RE: 
Manufacturing Hipot Testing                            
                    o.ieee.org                                                  
                                           
                                                                                
                                           
                                                                                
                                           
                    08/20/01 01:44 PM                                           
                                           
                    Please respond to                                           
                                           
                    Kazimier_Gawrzyjal                                          
                                           
                                                                                
                                           
                                                                                
                                           





For Hi-pot, see CAN/CSA C22.2 No 60950-00 * UL 60950, ed. 3, Dec. 1, 2000,
cl. 5.2.2 Note 1 and the invoked definition (by NOTE 1) for ROUTINE TEST per
cl. 1.2.13.3.


My opinion and not that of my employer.

Regards,
Kaz Gawrzyjal
Dell Computer Corp.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Manufacturing Hipot Testing



I read in !emc-pstc that Peter Merguerian <[email protected]> wrote
(in <2D1037012914D4118DB8204C4F4F50202D5CD4@ITLLTD01>) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Mon, 20 Aug 2001:
>Production - Line Tests (usually Dilectric Strength and Earth Continuity
and
>in some cases like medical equipment, Leakage ) are not required by the
>standards but by the third party certification agencies.

No, they are written into IEC standards now. I don't know about UL and
CSA.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk

Eat mink and be dreary!

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"






-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"


Reply via email to