Debatable in my experience which is not a lot. There's two totally different standards for errors. One's a bit error limit and the other is a time errored limit.
An errored second can have any amount of errors during that second. It's not a bit error limit. It's a time errored limit. But can migrate ultimately into interpretations bit errored limits and of equipment availability which is THE bottom line with the customers. You will be left on your own devices explaining to your customers exactly what pass/fail criteria or interpretations you used for the test. I would suggest that your marketing people are the ones with the final responsibility for this interpretation or for what the customers are looking for with this testing. Not you. - Doug McKean ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
