Hi Scott and the group,

Just a thought... If the equipment you are testing responds unfavorably
to something the environment, it does not matter that you pass GR-1089.
And, I have seen lots of stuff that affected lightwave equipment not
covered under 1089 that got the operating companies pretty upset. For
example, jingling change (we had a discussion some time ago on this list
about this), but there are others.

The customer expects the equipment to work the way he wants, not the way
we design or the marketing org sells it, or the way it is tested. Give
me a call or send email and I will briefly fill you in on what I have
seen. It would be difficult to type it all here.

Doug

Scott Lemon wrote:
> 
> Hi group,
> I am looking for guidance with respect to allowable "service-affecting
> responses" for a SONET system (e.g. OC-48) when tested to GR-1089 ESD
> immunity requirements.  GR-1089 R2-3 states that "service-affecting
> responses, unless within system operating limits,...shall not occur."
> Para. 2.3 gives "maximum of one errored second per discharge" as a limit
> on bit errors, but no other specific guidance.  Anyone out there willing
> to share their GR-1089 pass/fail criteria for ESD testing on a SONET
> system with respect to performance during the discharge??  Are there any
> documents that are recommended as reference?
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Regards,
> Scott Lemon
> [email protected]
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
>      Dave Heald                [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------
    ___          _       Doug Smith
     \          / )      P.O. Box 1457
      =========          Los Gatos, CA 95031-1457
   _ / \     / \ _       TEL/FAX: 408-356-4186/358-3799
 /  /\  \ ] /  /\  \     Mobile:  408-858-4528
|  q-----( )  |  o  |    Email:   [email protected]
 \ _ /    ]    \ _ /     Website: http://www.dsmith.org
-------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"

Reply via email to