Another UL specific test to consider it the Connector Current Interrupt Test.
Hot plug your device 200 times and recheck the dielectric strength and earth
path. It is a new UL requirements and the test sheet currently does not have a
number on it. Well not he one I had to fill in the other month.


[email protected] wrote:

> Dan,
>
> Without knowing any detail on your product, my vote is to say that all of
> the requirements of 60950 that apply to any other power supply would apply
> in full to a hot swappable supply.  Assuming the supply you're handling is
> akin to a bank of rectifiers in a shelf, the shelf would also need space
> fillers to close off access to hazardous parts in the event that a full
> complement of supplies is not used. I assume the over-all design addresses
> in-rush currents at both the supply and shelf ends, labels, warnings,
> instructions, etc....the full monty.
>
> My opinion and not that of my employer.
> Regards,
> Kaz Gawrzyjal
> [email protected]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, William G [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:50 PM
> To: 'Dan Teninty'
> Cc: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: Hot Swappable Power Supplies ?
>
> There must be a bleeder resistor (across the X caps) to make the AC input
> pins safe to touch once the supply is removed from the cabinet.
>
> If there are exposed voltage or energy hazards with the supply removed,
> there must be a restriction such that only trained personnel are instructed
> to do this OR a tool must be used to remove the supply.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Teninty [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:16 PM
> To: Emc-Pstc@Majordomo. Ieee. Org
> Subject: Hot Swappable Power Supplies ?
>
> Do any of my esteemed colleagues know of any specific requirements in 60950
> (UL/CSA or EN) relating specifically to hot swappable power supplies?  A
> search in the PDF version of UL/CSA 60950 reveals nothing specific when
> searching for "hot", "swap", or "power supply". A visual search of the TOC
> also reveals nothing specific.
>
> 2.6.5.4 deals with :
>
> Parts that can be removed by an operator
> Protective earthing connections shall make earlier and break later than the
> supply connections
> in each of the following:
> - the connector of a part that can be removed by an OPERATOR;
> - a plug on a power supply cord;
> - an appliance coupler.
> Compliance is checked by inspection.
>
> This is the most I could find that was related, and then it is referring to
> the AC side.
>
> Thought I would triple check with the collective brain trust to be sure.
>
> Appreciate any pointers to passages that I missed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel E. Teninty, P.E.
> Managing Partner
> DTEC Associates LLC
> Streamlining the Compliance Process
> 5406 S. Glendora Drive
> Spokane, WA 99223
> (509) 443-0215
> (509) 443-0181 fax
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
>      Dave Heald                [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
>      Dave Heald                [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
>      Dave Heald                [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"

--

Andrew Carson - Product Safety Engineer
Xyratex Engineering Laboratory
Tele 023 92496855 Fax 023 92496014



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"


Reply via email to