<[email protected]>, Jon D. Curtis <jdc@curtis- straus.com> wrote: >I personally think this interpretation is overly severe, but we comply with it >because we want our test reports to be accepted by authorities who think this >process is reasonable.
You are effectively succumbing to technological blackmail, and making resistance to such nonsense that much more difficult for others. I suppose the idea is that the calibrated equipment might catch an 'uncalibrating' infection from other equipment. (;-) -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Foxhunters suffer from tallyhosis. PLEASE do not mail copies of newsgroup posts to me. ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
