<[email protected]>, Brian Harlowe <[email protected]> wrote: >I seem to have hit a raw nerve by suggesting that emc test equipment should >be NAMAS calibrated. But surely some cost for calibration should come into >the equation. Surely no professional test engineer would use test equipment >that had not been calibrated at least annually!!!
The objection is to the 'expensive' word 'NAMAS'. Calibration, mainly by less costly means, is certainly necessary. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Foxhunters suffer from tallyhosis. PLEASE do not mail copies of newsgroup posts to me. ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
