forwarding for [email protected] ____________________Reply Separator____________________ Subject: RE: Client Presence During Testing Author: "Roger Magnuson" <[email protected]> List-Post: [email protected] Date: 1/24/01 2:47 PM
Kate, We are a test lab as well as a regular client at many different labs around the world and we never use test labs that don't allow us to attend the testing. We always provide technical support during testing which in my opinion benefits all involved. The same applies when we do the testing, if only the client representative is competent we prefer to get immediate support instead of endless discussions via email (or late night phone calls). Roger Magnuson Managing Director, TGC AB Dalvagen 28, 169 56 SOLNA, Sweden TEL: +46 856250050 (direct) FAX: +46 856250045 mobile: +46 707770594 mailto:[email protected] internet: http://www.tgc.se -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:04 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Client Presence During Testing Hello, Folks - Can you share with me how your favourite/preferred lab(s) handle client presence during testing? I'd like to know a) Do they allow presence in lab (technical area) itself ? If not, then where are clients who are at the lab normally placed? b) Are engineering/design type tests handled differently than compliance in this respect? c) What about formal witnessing of tests? d) How you feel about the policies that are in use? Do they influence your choice of labs? f) Have any related polices recently changed in the labs you use? How do you feel about this, and is it an influencer? e) Any other comments about this? Huge thanks in advance for your input! (Labs are welcome to comment, too!) Kate Kathy M. MacLean President, APREL Laboratories -EMC-RF Safety-Antenna design/test-SAR/MPE- -Environmental-Acoustics-Wireless- 51 Spectrum Way, Nepean, Ontario K2R 1E6 (613) 820-2730 fax (613) 820-4161 cell (613) 791-3777 Web site: http://www.aprel.com - watch for our new web site coming soon! Received: from ruebert.ieee.org ([199.172.136.3]) by mail.monarch.com with SMTP (IMA Internet Exchange 3.14) id 00014999; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:49:08 -0800 Received: by ruebert.ieee.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA18141 Received: from gemini3.ieee.org by ruebert.ieee.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA18121; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:49:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from tfs.tgc.se ([193.15.228.173]) by gemini3.ieee.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA26745 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:49:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from roger.tgc.se (roger) [192.168.135.231] by tfs.tgc.se with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 14LQHW-0000cE-00; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:48:14 +0100 Reply-To: <[email protected]> From: "Roger Magnuson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Client Presence During Testing List-Post: [email protected] Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:47:06 +0100 Message-ID: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3144CA05F1D7D211851900105AC9801E15BC1D@APR01S1> X-Resent-To: [email protected] Precedence: bulk ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: [email protected] Michael Garretson: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected]
