ce-test is a test house ... We do ce-testing for LVD, EMC and MDD Class 1 and R&TTE equipment. We can perform tests without client coming over but....
We usually appreciate clients coming over. First because we want to make sure the equipment under test is operating correctly. and because the miscellaneous test operating modi are better known by client. Second: Client can also function as a free second operator for those large EUT's difficult to operate alone. Operating at 2 from us costs us more... Third : for a durable customer relation, he needs to understand the problems of emc-testing, and witness how a small modification, apparently unimportant may make or break his design. Next time his product complies at once, drastically reducing test time (especially emissions) and this creates benefits to us and them being able to negotiate better prices. Fourth: Witnessing the test makes customers have confidence in the way you treat their product serious. (we do....!) We can make mistakes, clients help us avoiding them. "you forgot to restart....". This avoids us to "have to cover up those annoying errors that some customers don't accept us to make .... This always pays back to us in the four ways above, and has created many lasting customers. One disadvantage: After a few tests customers think we can do it alone...,;<)) Regards, Gert Gremmen, (Ing) ce-test, qualified testing =============================================== Web presence http://www.cetest.nl CE-shop http://www.cetest.nl/ce_shop.htm /-/ Compliance testing is our core business /-/ =============================================== >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf >>Of k.macl...@aprel.com >>Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 2:04 AM >>To: t...@world.std.com; emc-p...@ieee.org >>Subject: Client Presence During Testing >> >> >> >>Hello, Folks - >> >>Can you share with me how your favourite/preferred lab(s) handle client >>presence during testing? I'd like to know >> >>a) Do they allow presence in lab (technical area) itself ? If not, then >>where are clients who are at the lab normally placed? >>b) Are engineering/design type tests handled differently than >>compliance in >>this respect? >>c) What about formal witnessing of tests? >>d) How you feel about the policies that are in use? Do they >>influence your >>choice of labs? >>f) Have any related polices recently changed in the labs you use? How do >>you feel about this, and is it an influencer? >>e) Any other comments about this? >> >>Huge thanks in advance for your input! (Labs are welcome to >>comment, too!) >> >>Kate >> >>Kathy M. MacLean >>President, APREL Laboratories >>-EMC-RF Safety-Antenna design/test-SAR/MPE- >>-Environmental-Acoustics-Wireless- >>51 Spectrum Way, Nepean, Ontario K2R 1E6 >>(613) 820-2730 fax (613) 820-4161 >>cell (613) 791-3777 >>Web site: http://www.aprel.com - watch for our new web site coming soon! >> >> >>------------------------------------------- >>This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety >>Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. >> >>To cancel your subscription, send mail to: >> majord...@ieee.org >>with the single line: >> unsubscribe emc-pstc >> >>For help, send mail to the list administrators: >> Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com >> Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org >> >>For policy questions, send mail to: >> Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org >> >>
<<attachment: Gert Gremmen.vcf>>
