I read in !emc-pstc that [email protected] wrote (in <13f.dcb713b.2a043a2 [email protected]>) about 'CE MARKING A SYSTEM', on Fri, 3 May 2002: > >So true, the TCF route is not intended to get around the requirements. It is >mainly for large machines that can not be moved and products with numerous >configuations that can not be fully tested, etc... > This is really too strict an interpretation. The TCF rout is valid in *any* case where, in the opinion of a Notified Body, a deviation from a standard may be permitted or where there is no applicable standard. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!
------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
