I read in !emc-pstc that John Shinn <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'EMC- related safety issues', on Thu, 3 Jan 2002:
>NO NO NO. Don't think about the plane. There will be more red tape >than you want to think about, especially if it is bolted down (permanently >installed). >If not approved by the appropriate government agency (the FAA's FSDO - >Flight Safety District Office), it could cause loss of airworthyness of the >aircraft. Even more problems if you have to punch a hole in the skin. >But, just from the paperwork issue, don't go there. I don't actually have a plane, but the camera manufacturer doesn't know that, so in the present circumstances he must assume that I do! I'll mount it on my hydrogen balloon instead.(;-) -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
