I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'double-pole switching and fusing', on Wed, 20 Feb 2002: >Tables 2E and 2F are invoked only by the Note 2 >to Sub-clause 2.7.4. > >A Note is informative, not a requirement.
Yes, well, Note 2 is weasel-worded. It claims to be 'informative' but some test houses hold that if Table 2E or 2F is not observed, the 'essential requirements' of the LVD are not met. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
