Hi John:
> I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute <[email protected]> wrote (in
> <[email protected]>) about 'double-pole switching
> and fusing', on Wed, 20 Feb 2002:
> >Tables 2E and 2F are invoked only by the Note 2
> >to Sub-clause 2.7.4.
> >
> >A Note is informative, not a requirement.
>
> Yes, well, Note 2 is weasel-worded. It claims to be 'informative' but
> some test houses hold that if Table 2E or 2F is not observed, the
> 'essential requirements' of the LVD are not met.
Sigh... I agree with your assessment.
I suppose such test houses do not understand
that the LVD does not necessarily require
compliance to a standard?
Rich
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Ron Pickard: [email protected]
Dave Heald: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
