Hi Folks

A few further points that I thought of after sending the first message:

g) Hipotting a piece of repaired equipment does not automatically prove that
it is safe (in fact it can be internally awful but still pass the hipot
test!). 

h) It should also involve a comprehensive earth continuity check on Class I
equipment - in fact I think that is more important than the high voltage
check because it will (should!) deal with many faults which could occur due
to safety-related faults in hazardous circuits.

i) Most people do not understand what hipotting is intended to do anyway,
and so do not afford it the respect and importance that it should be given
to be performed effectively and safely.

John Allen
Thales Defence 
Bracknell, UK.


-----Original Message-----
From: Anderson Cheng (TPE) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 02:59
To: '[email protected]'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Compliance After Repairs in the Field



If products required to have 100% production-line tests (such as Hi-pot and
Ground Continuity tests), then I required that tests should be made in the
field after repairs.  I think it at least benefits checking out the minimum
safety constructions are still functioning well.

Regards,
Anderson Cheng
High Tech Computer Corp.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Compliance After Repairs in the Field

Greetings,

We are a manufacturer of Laboratory Equipment.  We evaluate our products to
UL 3101-1, CSA 1010.0 and EN 61010.  When we repair a product in the field,
which may include replacing power supplies, line filters, etc., what
obligations do we have to verify continuing compliance with the safety
specifications we originally evaluated our products against?  Do we need to
perform applicable safety testing following these repairs?

Traditionally, NRTL's are not concerned with the product once it leaves the
factory.  They do not require follow-up testing to be performed after
repairs are made in the field.  Since we self-certify to the LVD, should we
take a different approach to repairs in the field compared to the approach
NRTL's take?

Does your company have a specific process that is followed when repairs are
made in the field to verify continuing compliance?  If so, what is that
process?

All responses are appreciated.

Regards

Joe Martin
EMC/Product Safety Engineer
Applied Biosystems
[email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to