I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in <LFENJLPMMJB mhpeibnilkejlccaa.am...@westin-emission.no>) about 'SV: ITE Class A vs B Emissions', on Tue, 5 Feb 2002: >But I also recall that may >test laboratories / notified body classifies class A as a heavy industrial >environment. Business/office environment are often classified as >residential, commercial and light industrial and therefore class B.
This is true. However, we know that a lot of Class A equipment IS used in commercial, light industrial and even residential environments, in Europe as well as elsewhere, and, AFAIK, the level of complaints of interference is not excessive. I presume that this is due to the low usage of AM reception now, in most areas, and the low expectations of those that do receive it, on $10 trannies or $50 boom boxes, not magnificent Grundig-type table radios with 4.495 kHz overall bandwidth. So there are good grounds, IMO, for a single set of limits, nearer Class A than Class B. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
