John, If I said that the LVD was 'new approach' then you or someone else would feel the necessity to correct me. Instead I am being castigated for being accurate but hair-splitting.
So be it. Richard Hughes -----Original Message----- From: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 28 October 2002 12:08 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LED's and laser safety? I read in !emc-pstc that Richard Hughes <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected] el.com>) about 'LED's and laser safety?' on Mon, 28 Oct 2002: > A product carries a CE marking to show that it complies with the national > implementations of all applicable 'new approach' EU Directives (and the LVD, > which isn't 'new approach'). > Why do you say that the LVD is not 'new approach'? It refers to standards, and does not embody the technical provisions itself. I suppose it's not formally 'new approach' because it dates from 1973, long before the term 'new approach' was introduced. But that is hair- splitting. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
