----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Ericson <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Cc: Harry Hodes <[email protected]>; James Ericson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: ESD Generator confidence test


> Hello Vic!
>
> Verification of the 61000-4-2 ESD waveform requires some careful
> engineering, no matter which approach you take.  Basically, you need to
> verify (among other things) the front-edge risetime, which is at (or
> slightly below) 1 nanosecond.  The harmonic content of the RF produced by
an
> ESD pulse is largely dependent on the pulse risetime.
>
> To seriously verify this risetime, you need precise fixturing (i.e., the
> Pelligrini Target described in the 61000-4-2 Standard), plus a 1 GHz
> oscilloscope, a Faraday Cage, and plenty of attention to setup conditions
> ... including physical placement of the Generator ground strap.  I don't
> believe there is a "simple" way to do it.
>
> To verify our Generators (Haefely-Trench models), I built the Pelligrini
> Target described in the Standard.  It is quite an exercise in precision
> machining of brass, learning how to electroplate Silver, etc.  If you
don't
> have access to a lathe, vertical milling machine, drill press, and
> chemicals,  you can doubtless find a local machinist that will tackle this
> thing.  I built our target for approximately $200 US.   A commercial
target
> costs upwards of $2000.  Plus calibration.  We paid Haefely to run an A-B
> comparison calibration with their standard target, and the results were
very
> close.  Now, we use that data (and our target) to verify our ESD
Generators
> between "formal" annual calibrations by the manufacturer.
>
> Give me a call if you would like any details on our target.
1-888-226-3837.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim Ericson
> Senior EMC Engineer
> Acme Testing Company
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:00 AM
> Subject: ESD Generator confidence test
>
>
> >
> > The ESD standard IEC 61000-4-2 gives details for the manufacture of a
> > current target, used for verifying the ESD waveform.
> >
> > I appreciate this could be used as a confidence check before
administering
> > the test, but does anyone have another approach that they would be
willing
> > to share.
> >
> > Many thanks
> >
> > Vic Gibling
> >
> > EMC Engineer
> >
> > Raytheon Systems Limited
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> >
> > Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> >
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> >      [email protected]
> > with the single line:
> >      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> >
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> >      Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
> >      Dave Heald:               [email protected]
> >
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> >      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
> >      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> >
> > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> >     http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
> >     Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
> >
>


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to