I've been getting quite a few emails regarding "age discrimination" regarding the email below. Just so it's known, the recruiter did not place this requirement on the job, nor did I. The requirements are poorly written, no question. My intent was to allow someone the opportunity to gain employment and feed their family. The requirements seem to be the result of a conversation, not a legal briefing. I have no idea who the company is, nor do I care, but for the sake of those in the midst of a job search, they are who this was intended for. I will certainly edit the next request I get and provide less information than I did this time, but I think it's important to take this email for what it was, trying to help someone get a job. Thanks, Mike ----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Cantwell <mailto:[email protected]> To: Emc-Pstc <mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Bryan Axmear <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:22 PM Subject: Job Opportunity - Maryland I received the following job opportunity from this recruiter: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] He has helped others on this list find employment in the past so if anyone is interested in this position or knows of someone interested in this position either contact him directly or you can contact me and I'll help them get through. Looks like the emphasis is on design and analysis and not on testing. For whatever reason, age seems to matter, I'm sure to reflect salary versus experience. Good luck to those interested. Job Description: I need a emi/emc ANALYSIS/DESIGN (opposed to a straight test) guy that graduated from college between the years of 1988-1992. Job in maryland. Emi analysis, pspice, mathcad, RF work of any kind. t1) a graduate that didnt graduate any earlier than 1986 2) the candidate knows that my manager may want to make him an offer after 9 months for perm placment 3) it is emc/emi analysis and design instead of straight emi/emc testing
