I believe that this sort of age specificity, even if cloaked in graduation year, is illegal in the United States. Not that it doesn't go on all the time, but it is illegal, and in my opinion, wrong. Some years ago there was a flap with IEEE Spectrum running ads that asked for (for example) 2-8 years experience. The legal way to state this is "a minimum of 2 years experience." The cap on maximum experience is subtle (and illegal) age discrimination. The recruiter (Bryan) is probably stuck in the middle, trying to satisfy a client (improperly) setting these requirements. Well, that's my opinion. Others may have at it. Jacob Z. Schanker, P.E. 65 Crandon Way Rochester, NY 14618 Tel: 585 442 3909 Fax: 585 442 2182 [email protected]
----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Cantwell <mailto:[email protected]> To: Emc-Pstc <mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Bryan Axmear <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:22 PM Subject: Job Opportunity - Maryland I received the following job opportunity from this recruiter: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] He has helped others on this list find employment in the past so if anyone is interested in this position or knows of someone interested in this position either contact him directly or you can contact me and I'll help them get through. Looks like the emphasis is on design and analysis and not on testing. For whatever reason, age seems to matter, I'm sure to reflect salary versus experience. Good luck to those interested. Job Description: I need a emi/emc ANALYSIS/DESIGN (opposed to a straight test) guy that graduated from college between the years of 1988-1992. Job in maryland. Emi analysis, pspice, mathcad, RF work of any kind. t1) a graduate that didnt graduate any earlier than 1986 2) the candidate knows that my manager may want to make him an offer after 9 months for perm placment 3) it is emc/emi analysis and design instead of straight emi/emc testing
