I read in !emc-pstc that Cereceres, David <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'Security Camera' on Mon, 12 Jan 2004: >I believe that EN 60065 would be a more realistic standard. In dealing with >both the 60950 & 60065 standards in the CCTV industry and in speaking with >several agencies it was determined that IEC 60065 based standards were a >more realistic approach.
I can't argue against that, but the CENELEC committee decided otherwise > >Mr. Woodgate, >Could you please be kind enough to direct me to any CENELEC product >committee decision documentation on this subject. This sounds very >interesting. Committee decisions are not normally in the public domain. You have to interpret the opinions from the published standards. I tried to find more information for you, but I haven't been able to. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
