FYI,


Reference to ANSI C63.4 - for Site Attenuation , Antennas and -4.4.2
Antenna calibration.

Reference antennas - shall be calibrated in accordance with the methods
specified in ANSI C63.5-1988 and ANSI C63.5-1998 (30 MHz to 1GHz).
Antennas for use at or above 1 GHz sall be calibrated in accordance with
one of the methods in ANSI C63.5 - 1998 or IEEE Std 149-1979.


Thanks


Joshua Kim
Senior Regulatory Engineer

Welch Allyn
4341 State Street Road
P.O. Box 220
Skaneateles Falls, NY
13153-0220
Tel. (315) 554-5289
Fax (315) 685-2532
e-mail: [email protected]
web: www.welchallyn.com



                      Ken Javor
                      <ken.javor@emccomplia        To:       "'emc-pstc'"
<[email protected]>
                      nce.com>                     cc:
                      Sent by:                     Subject:  Re: Normalised
Site Attenuation
                      owner-emc-pstc@listse
                      rv.ieee.org


                      09/15/2004 10:15 PM






I don't have the latest C63.4, but technically it is pretty straightforward
why you cannot verify an NSA with a site source.

An NSA has to be made with a matched set of antennas because the antenna
factors for the antennas are determined using a matched set.  By matched I
don't mean identical like balancing pistons, but two antennas of the same
type, like two biconicals of the same dimensions, or two log-periodics of
the same dimensions.

If the NSA were made at such a distance that the two antennas were truly in
each other's far fields and each antenna were immersed in a plane wave,
then
you could use whatever source you wanted, as long as the (far field) gain
were specified.  But that is not the case.  To see this, just go to the
ETS-Lindgren web site and compare 1, 3, and 10 meter antenna factors for
the
same antenna.

http://www.emctest.com/product_Results.cfm?producttype=Antennas&applications

=All%20Applications&test_types=All%20Test%20Types&standards=All%20Standards

For example, look at gains and antenna factors for the 3104C biconical and
the 3147 log-periodic.

Ken Javor


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to