In message <[email protected]>, dated Tue, 7 Mar 2006, maddog 4030 <[email protected]> writes >I can see how it could be a "trick questi! on" if dated or specific >versions of the standard were specified by countries or other calling >standards.
CENELEC has decided that the advantages of dated references in avoiding this sort of uncertainty outweigh the disadvantages. IEC has rejected a uniform policy and will leave the question to individual product committees to determine, which, in my opinion, is a recipe for chaos. I think ETSI should learn from CENELEC. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immoderately. John Woodgate - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
