In message <231db4b2f2634a4c94d87d89a4fa81d201543...@ny13ex011.global.ds.honeywell.c om>, dated Wed, 6 Sep 2006, "Sterner, David [S&FS]" <[email protected]> writes
>The bright side is that EN61000-4-2 results may be acceptable for >publication in "The Journal of Irreproducible Results". Contact The >Society for Basic Irreproducible Research, P.O. 234, Chicago Heights, >Ill. 60411. You could say the same about a very large proportion of EMC test results, for any of the usual phenomena. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
