I believe that I see where the confusion arises.
 
Whereas the Low Voltage Directive applies to equipment, and hence would not
include an enclosure within its scope, the list of harmonised standards under
the LVD includes many standards for components and materials, among them EN
50298:1998 which applies to enclosures.
 
Now, if an enclosure is assessed to this standard does it thus conform to the
LVD, and should it therefore be CE marked? I would say not on the grounds of
my first statement about scope, but can understand why many enclosure
manufacturers would want to apply the CE marking in the hope of appearing to
have greater safety or other desirable characteristics than the enclosure that
is not marked.
 
We really have nobody to blame for this situation but ourselves for allowing
component standards to be harmonised and listed along with equipment
standards. What is really required is a primary and secondary list of
standards, whereby the primary standards apply to equipment and invoke CE
marking, and the secondary standards apply to components that are thereby
presumed to conform to requirements when addressed within the safety
assessment of equipment, but which do not themselves require CE marking.
 
Personal opinions only.
Best regards 

Neil R. Barker CEng MIET FSEE MIEEE 
Manager 
Quality Engineering 
e2v technologies (uk) ltd 
106 Waterhouse Lane 
Chelmsford 
Essex CM1 2QU 
UK 

Tel: (+44) 1245 453616 
Fax: (+44) 1245 453571 
Mob: (+44) 7801 723735 


From: Grace Lin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 23 October 2006 12:44
To: JOHN ALLEN
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CE Questions


John,
 
Thank you so much for your comments and John Woodgate's.
 
My colleague, who initiated the questions, told me last Friday (after reading
John Woodgate's comments) that a lab said that CE (and test) was required for
an enclosure.  I asked him to find out the Directive and test standards (from
the lab) that applied to an enclosure. 
 
Since I am not a Safety expert, I don't give Safety related comments to my
colleagues and rely on members' support and help.  I will let you know if I
hear a response from the lab.
 
Best regards,
Grace

 
On 10/21/06, JOHN ALLEN <[email protected]> wrote: 

Grace
 
For questions 1 & 3, the answers are both basically NO, because in cases like
these the FINAL equipment configuration designer /  manufacturer is
responsible for compliance with all the relevant Directives. 
 
He must make the final determination and apply the Marking (and do everything
else that that requires).
 
CE + CE = CE  does not work because 
a) The law does not require that components should not be marked anyway (and
some Directives actually prohibit the marking on components - though most
do'nt)  although many manufacturers do this because their customers ask for
it. 
b) Only at the final equipment design stage can you assess compliance to the
overall equipment standard.
 
Personally, in most instances ( I nearly used the word "cases"!) I would not
recommend a case manufacturer to apply the mark for the sake of his own (or
his EU importers') protection. If his/their name is on the unit with the CE
Marking  and the final manufacturer assembler does not do a proper job, then
it is possible that the case manufacturer/importer could be incorrectly
indentified as the "guilty party" and legal action be taken against them
(erroniously!). 
 
Hope someone else can answer Q2.
 
Regards
 
John Allen



From: [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Grace Lin
Sent: 19 October 2006 06:29
To: [email protected]
Subject: CE Questions



Dear Members,

 

Question 1:

Does an enclosure need to be CE marked for the EU market?  My employer sells
enclosures for lighting modules.   For enclosure alone (such as the one at 
<http://www.crestron.com/products/show_
roducts.asp?type=commercial&cat=14&subcat=1072&id=1063>
http://www.crestron.com/products/show_p
oducts.asp?type=commercial&cat=14&subcat=1072&id=1063), I cannot tell which
Directive an enclosure applies to from the list of New Approach directives 

 <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newapp
oach/standardization/harmstds/reflist.html>
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/newappro
ch/standardization/harmstds/reflist.html ). 

 

Question 2:

What is the safety standard applying to a dimmer module like the one at 
<http://www.crestron.com/products/show_
roducts.asp?type=commercial&cat=14&subcat=1007&id=1077>
http://www.crestron.com/products/show_p
oducts.asp?type=commercial&cat=14&subcat=1007&id=1077?  I assume (please
correct me if I am wrong) EN55015 and EN61547 are the EMC test standards. 

 

Question 3:

IF a CE mark applies to an enclosure from Question 1 and a lighting module is
CE marked, can I say the lighting module(s) in an enclosure is CE marked (
i.e., CE+CE=CE?). 

 

Question 4:

Does everything selling to the Europe needs CE marked?

 

Thank you very much for your time and look forward to your help.

 

Best regards,

Grace Lin

Sr. Compliance Engineer

Crestron Electronics, Inc.

6 Volvo Drive

Rockleigh, NJ 07920

 <http://www.crestron.com/> www.crestron.com -
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 
--
No virus found in this incoming message. 
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.9/490 - Release Date: 20/10/06





































--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.9/490 - Release Date: 20/10/06



- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to