John,

I think this 'clarification' is actually confusing.

Fig 8 (61000-4-4:2004) shows 1m between the coupling device (in this case the
capacitive clamp) and the EUT, whilst towards the end of section 7.2.1 it is
stated that:

'Unless otherwise specified in the product standard or the product family
standard, the length of the signal and power lines between the coupling device
and the EUT shall be 0.5m +/- 0.05m'  

This doesn't appear to give much room for movement, certainly not an increase
to 1m.

In the 1995 version of the standard there was a clause which said 'The length
of the signal and power lines between the coupling device and the EUT shall be
1m or less' This has now been replaced (2004) by the 0.5m requirement


Mike Hurley





From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Woodgate

Sent: 04 December 2007 14:59

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: EFT Setup

In message <00b701c81c66$4c389e40$6401a8c0@Mike>, dated Thu, 1 Nov 2007, 

Mike Hurley <[email protected]> writes:

>Hi Ted, Grace

>

>The only requirement on distance between the EFT generator and the

>coupling clamp is a recommended maximum of 1m in Fig 6 (no minimum

>specified).

>

>As regards distance between the clamp and the EUT, the standard states

>in section 7.2.1 that 'when using the capacitive clamp, the minimum

>distance between the coupling plates and all other conductive surfaces,

>except the ground reference plane beneath the coupling clamp shall be

>0.5m' so I believe the answer to Graces second question is yes.

>

>In relation to the 0.5m cable length specified, there appears to be a

>contradiction in the standard as in Fig 8 for rack mounted equipment it

>indicates a 1m cable length.  Does anyone know the reason for this?

>

>

I did take this up with IEC and after a while, I received this reply:

"The only requirement on distance between the EFT generator and the 

coupling clamp is a recommended maximum of 1m in Fig 6 (no minimum 

specified).

***Correct

As regards distance between the clamp and the EUT, the standard states 

in section 7.2.1 that 'when using the capacitive clamp, the minimum 

distance between the coupling plates and all other conductive surfaces, 

except the ground reference plane beneath the coupling clamp shall be 

0.5m.

***This is a minimum distance which can be more than 0,5 m, e.g. 1 m.

In relation to the 0.5m cable length specified, there appears to be a 

contradiction in the standard as in Fig 8 for rack mounted equipment it 

indicates a 1m cable length. Does anyone know the reason for this?


***There is no contradiction according to my comment above. Moreover the 

distance between the coupling clamp and the EUT on the one hand and the 

length of the cable between the coupling clamp and the EUT on the other 

hand should not be mixed up. The first one can be 0,5 m but not less 

while the second one is 1 m. In my opinion there is no contradiction but 

rephrasing may be necessary as some users are confused.

-- 

OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk

For very important information, please turn over.

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society

emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]

     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition. 

Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1169 - Release Date: 03/12/07
22:56

 


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.14/1171 - Release Date: 04/12/07
19:31
  

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


Reply via email to