Hi,
the Figure 8 is generally for cases where there is no chance to reach
the EUT with a 50 cm cable.

regards
Ari Honkala

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
>Of ext Mike Hurley
>Sent: 1. marraskuuta 2007 11:05
>To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: EFT Setup
>
>Hi Ted, Grace
>
>The only requirement on distance between the EFT generator and the
>coupling clamp is a recommended maximum of 1m in Fig 6 (no minimum
>specified). 
>
>As regards distance between the clamp and the EUT, the standard states
>in section 7.2.1 that 'when using the capacitive clamp, the minimum
>distance between the coupling plates and all other conductive surfaces,
>except the ground reference plane beneath the coupling clamp shall be
>0.5m' so I believe the answer to Graces second question is yes.  
>
>In relation to the 0.5m cable length specified, there appears to be a
>contradiction in the standard as in Fig 8 for rack mounted equipment it
>indicates a 1m cable length.  Does anyone know the reason for this?
>
>
>Mike Hurley
>
>Mead testing ltd
>www.meadtest.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>[email protected]
>Sent: 30 October 2007 12:16
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: EFT Setup
>
>Hello Grace,
>
>I do not believe that there is a specific separation 
>requirement between
>the EFT generator and the coupling clamp.  I have a system from Keytek
>that
>came with a 0.5 m cable to connect the generator and the clamp.  If
>anything, I find supplied cable to be too short for my needs.  
>From what
>I
>know, the capacitive clamp should not cause interference with the EFT
>generator even if they are in close proximity.
>
>The coupling clamp should not create significant radiated noise.  In
>this I
>mean that the noise radiated by the clamp will be far less than that
>coupled into the EUT through the cable under test.  There should not be
>a
>significant problem with the test if the EUT is less than 0.5 
>m from the
>clamp as long as you have the 0.5 m length of exposed cable that is
>specified.
>
>I will admit that I am not an expert in EMC measurements.  I have been
>working with susceptibility testing for about eight years, but 
>it only a
>fraction of the work that I perform.  I am posting my opinion 
>(and it is
>only an opinion) because I have not yet seen a response to 
>your inquiry.
>I
>would like to encourage the more experienced EMC professionals 
>to let me
>know if my though process is sound on this issue.  If I am 
>wrong, let me
>know; I am eager to learn more about the rationale behind the test
>procedure.
>
>Ted Eckert
>American Power Conversion/MGE
>http://www.apc.com/
>
>The items contained in this e-mail reflect the personal opinions of the
>writer and are only provided for the assistance of the reader. The
>writer
>is not speaking in an official capacity for APC-MGE or Schneider
>Electric.
>The speaker does not represent APC-MGE's or Schneider Electric's
>official
>position on any matter.
>
>
> 
>
>             "Grace Lin"
>
>             <gracelinnj@gmail
>
>             .com>
>To 
>             Sent by:                  [email protected]
>
>             [email protected]
>cc 
> 
>
> 
>Subject 
>             10/29/2007 02:24          EFT Setup
>
>             PM
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>Dear Members,
>
>I have two questions and appreciate your inputs:
>
>1. Is there any clearance distance/requirement between an EFT generator
>and
>a capacitive coupling clamp (ccc)?
>
>2. Is there any clearance distance/requirement between EUT and a
>capacitive
>coupling clamp (CCC)?  From Figure 1 of IEC 61000-4-4, the cable length
>between the capacitive coupling clamp and the EUT "should be 0.5m +/-
>0.05
>m".  Does this mean the distance between EUT and CCC should also be
>0.5m?
>
>We built a 4ft x 8ft table with the same size of metal sheet (reference
>to
>ground reference) on top of it.  I would like to place an EFT 
>generator,
>CCC, and EUT on top of the table.
>
>Thank you for your time and look forward to your help.
>
>Best regards,
>Grace Lin
>- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
>message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
>discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
>
>To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>
>
>Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>
>
>List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
>
>For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>
>
>Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected]
>
>
>For policy questions, send mail to:
>
>
>Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected]
>
>
>All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>
>
>http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>
>-
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
>To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>
>Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>
>List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
>For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>
>     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
>     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
>
>For policy questions, send mail to:
>
>     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>     David Heald:            [email protected]
>
>All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>
>    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1098 - Release Date:
>29/10/07 09:28
> 
>
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.16/1102 - Release Date:
>31/10/07 16:38
> 
>
>-
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
>To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>
>Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>
>List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
>For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>
>     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
>     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
>
>For policy questions, send mail to:
>
>     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>     David Heald:            [email protected]
>
>All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>
>    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to