In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Mark Briggs <[email protected]> writes:
>I would disagree with you for instances where you based compliance >around the generic standards' requirements because your product >standard did not address a phenomena that was addressed in the generic >standards, provided that the generic standard was appropriate to your >operating environment. The principle in CENELEC is that product standards take precedence over generic standards. The CENELEC EMC committee and the Commission's EMC Consultant review all product standards for unjustified omissions or unjustified non-conformity with the relevant Generic. So if a phenomenon is not treated in the product standard you do not have to apply the Generic. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Murphy's Law has now been officially re-named The Certainty Principle John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
