In message <4648D0FBBB099C429F108831EF2B06950595FA5B@rscknox-ms01.rsccorp.radiosys.c om>, dated Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Clif Brick <[email protected]> writes:
>I recall a report back some years ago where a hair dryer manufacturer >was fined for exceeding radiated emissions limits, such as those in >EN55022 or EN55011. EN55014 has no such limits, only disturbance >power from, in this case, the line cord up to 300MHz. No, the sanction was about safety violations. The EMC matter couldn't be actioned precisely because EN 55014-1 at that time didn't cover UHF emissions. The UK Government decided, however, not to mount an 'Article 8' (of 89/336) challenge to the standard, on the understanding that the standard would be amended. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Murphy's Law has now been officially re-named The Certainty Principle John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
