> -----Original Message-----

> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John

> Woodgate

> Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 7:47 AM

> To: [email protected]

> Subject: Re: Industrial Environment

> 

> In message <[email protected]>,

> dated Sun, 5 Sep 2010, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen"

> <[email protected]> writes:

> 

> ><Irony ON>

> >

> >Application is possible only in machines larger than 20 meter cubic

> >

> >in the center (10 meters from each edge) without any wireless

> > communication inside.

> >

> ><Irony off>

> 

> No, you have to measure from the *outside surface* of the product. A

> product embedded in concrete 10 m thick would qualify.(;-)

> --

> OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk

> John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

> If at first you don't succeed, delegate.

> But I support unbloated email http://www.asciiribbon.org/

 

 

 

If the product is embedded in 10 meters of concrete, my guys call that a
target.

 

Ed Price

[email protected] <blocked::mailto:[email protected]>      WB6WSN

NARTE Certified EMC Engineer

Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab

Cubic Defense Applications

San Diego, CA  USA

858-505-2780

Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty

 

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to