In message <of407be5e8.4f0508c5-on86257795.0050a32d-86257795.0050f...@mmm.com>, dated Sun, 5 Sep 2010, [email protected] writes:
>Gert, interesting take on this and logical. I am certain that when the >definition was formulated, protection of broadcast radio was the intent >but this may be a case of where the technology that came afterwards >changes the intent of the original definition. It isn't really the definition that has evolved, but CISPR (EN 55022 is the European version of CISPR 22). CISPR was originally very much concerned with the protection of broadcast services from potential interference. Now, its remit covers all radio. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK If at first you don't succeed, delegate. But I support unbloated email http://www.asciiribbon.org/ - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
