In message <074D7671D8D74339973279276937D262@MmPc21>, dated Fri, 7 Nov 
2008, Piotr Galka <[email protected]> writes:


>Do you know that way takes few weeks/months/years ?

You asked 'how to have the problem solved once for always'. There is no 
other way than the one I described to do that. It may be that there is 
on record a previous case in which special treatment was seen to be 
necessary for products of the type you are concerned with, in which case 
the time-scale could be quite short.

You could try the 'EMC assessment and Notified Body report' route for 
demonstrating compliance with the Directive without applying standards, 
but it's uncertain and costly in many cases. It, too, can take time and 
it takes money as well. And you seem to think that the emissions would 
be excessive anyway, so it's doubtful that you would get a positive 
report from the Notified Body.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Either we are causing global warming, in which case we may be able to stop it,
or natural variation is causing it, and we probably can't stop it. You choose!
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:           [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



Reply via email to