A tangential issue: those who rely on that algorithmic process often don't
know why certain things are required and  others left unsaid.  I've see a
manager forbid using a high-pass filter during CE testing because it appeared
nowhere in a standard's setup drawings. Demonstration was required!
 
 
Cortland
KA5S
 
 

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Ken Javor <mailto:[email protected]>  
        To: Untitled <mailto:[email protected]> 
        Sent: 8/11/2010 1:04:51 PM 
        Subject: Re: Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse 
modulation

        Bingo.  Clearly another driver for inserting MU where it doesn't belong 
is a
desire to replace the need for competent personnel with an algorithmic process
that works for any personnel.  But the same personnel who don’t know how to
properly perform the test will also not know how to run the algorithm. Hence
Mr. Walton’s observations on how poorly MU is executed in reality.
         
        Ken Javor
        
        Phone: (256) 650-5261
        
        
        
________________________________

        From: Dennis Ward <[email protected]>
        Reply-To: <[email protected]>
        Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:50:21 -0700
        To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, 
<[email protected]>
        Subject: RE: Calibration supplier for signal generator with pulse 
modulation
        
        I think I would only add that while measurement uncertainties for EMC is
nebulous at best, at the same time we do not want to get into the habit of a
slam dunk mentality of ‘oh, just a number, it doesn’t matter.”  
         
        That is why Derek’s statement of “What’s really needed is a competent
individual with adequate equipment” is so important.  Where electromagnetic
compatibility is concerned, competence of the engineers doing the measurement
is probably much more importa! nt than uncertainties. I know that one of the
biggest benefits to testing in the radio approvals industry is competence of
test personnel.
         
        Compliance does matter and the best way to keep unneeded uncertainties 
out of
the EMC measurement industry, is to keep competence of test personnel in.
        
        
        
         
        Dennis Ward 
        Director of Engineering
        American TCB 
        Certification Resource for the Wireless Industry www.atcb.com
<http://www.atcb.com/> <http://www.atcb.com/>  
        703-847-4700 fax 703-847-6888 
        direct - 703-880-4841 
        
        

         

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to