In message <p06240806c82ec3ba8ce8@[192.168.1.80]>, dated Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Nick Williams <[email protected]> writes:
>The reason I bring this up in the context of this discussion is because >the example which Steve used in his discussion was the use of lead in >shielding against ionising radiation. So, is the UK civil service up to it's tricks again, trying to 'gold-plate' Directives (make them more stringent than they are)? How can radiation shielding be 'electrical and electronic equipment', which is what RoHS is concerned with? Or is everything 'electrical' because it contains protons and electrons? -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
