In message <003501cae003$825da7a0$8718f6e0$@com>, dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Dennis Ward <[email protected]> writes:
>Ah yes - the 'Risk Management Team' - better know as the 'How many >people can die and how much money can be lost in law suits before we >make a safe product' team. What alternative do you suggest? I don't mean a paraphrase in 'more acceptable' words. It's not possible to make a 100% safe product, so how near to 100% do we need to be? Treat it as a question of morality, not commerce or engineering and you still end up with the same sort of decision. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
