In message <5ee25f4c3567f748871d74829b84dd9d4dd55...@tk5ex14mbxc141.redmond.corp.mic rosoft.com>, dated Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Ted Eckert <[email protected]> writes:
>Hydrogen is less volatile and safer to work with than methane. Why >worry about hydrogen in cars when we have had CNG (compressed natural >gas) vehicles on the roads for years. Many of us have natural gas >piped straight into our homes. In general, hydrogen is fairly safe and >easy to work with. A British physicist has calculated that a viable car could be made to run on compressed nitrogen. If so, that would be a VERY GOOD THING. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK I should be disillusioned, but it's not worth the effort. - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
