Just to be picky Bob,  there are several comb generators used to cover 
the EMC test range...

EUT's are likely cheaper :-)

Cheers,

Derek.

[email protected] wrote:
> If you want to compare how two test sites view a given EUT (real equipment)
> then of course you need and should use an EUT. But a given EUT will not
> give you the full range of frequencies needed to give you a full comparison
> of two sites unless of course the EUT is a reference radiator, comb
> generator, etc.
>
> Bob Heller
> 3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
> St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
> Tel:  651- 778-6336
> Fax:  651-778-6252
> =====================================
=========================================
>
>
>                                                                             
                                     
>   From:       Derek Walton <[email protected]>                             
                                     
>                                                                             
                                     
>   To:         Grace Lin <[email protected]>                              
                                     
>                                                                             
                                     
>   Cc:         "Grasso, Charles" <[email protected]>,
[email protected],         
>               [email protected]                                    
                                     
>                                                                             
                                     
>   Date:       11/24/2009 10:21 AM                                           
                                     
>                                                                             
                                     
>   Subject:    Re: [PSES] 3-meter Chamber Site Comparison                    
                                     
>                                                                             
                                     
>   Sent by:    <[email protected]>                                           
                                     
>                                                                             
                                     
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Grace,
>
> I reaffirm my stance that you should test a real EUT. To start, one with
> minimum cables, but a real EUT nonetheless.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Derek.
>
> Grace Lin wrote:
>   
>> Site comparison is requested by our design group.  They feel it is too
>> difficult to obtain a passing data from my lab. -Grace
>>
>> On 11/23/09, Grasso, Charles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Hello Grace,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The first question is - what do you mean by a site comparison? If by
>>> that you mean
>>> how well a site performs to established site attenuation - well then all
>>> you need is
>>> to have the site run the test.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If, by site comparison, you mean comparing one site against another then
>>> you actually
>>> have a more difficult problem as there are several variables that you
>>> will need to account for.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What has proved very successful is to use a standard calibrated source
>>> and provide the test
>>> lab with a detailed set of instructions on how to take the measurement.
>>> This methodology
>>> focuses on the site quality only! (Dell and HP are examples)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> NIST has a  very precise site source (the original design was done by
>>> Galen Koepke from NIST I believe)  HP developed their own source and
>>> reported that
>>> they reduced site to site variability to about 2dB!!  I cannot remember
>>> the
>>> individual that designed the source and did the work maybe someone from
>>> this list
>>> can help!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Charles Grasso
>>> Compliance Engineer
>>> Echostar Communications
>>> (w) 303-706-5467
>>> (c) 303-204-2974
>>> (t) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> (e) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> (e2) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>> [email protected]
>>> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:06 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [PSES] 3-meter Chamber Site Comparison
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If you can spare time why not try both an EUT and a 'comb' RF source?
>>> It would make a nice cross-check.
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>> _____________
>>>
>>> Ralph McDiarmid  |   Schneider Electric   |  Renewable Energies Business
>>> |   CANADA  |
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From:
>>>
>>> Grace Lin <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> To:
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Date:
>>>
>>> 11/20/2009 04:56 AM
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>>
>>> [PSES] 3-meter Chamber Site Comparison
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Members,
>>>
>>> I am asked to perform site comparison and would like to hear your
>>> comments.
>>>
>>> Should I purchase a signal source?  If yes, do you have any reference?
>>> I do have a COM-POWER comb generator and don't know if it is good enough
>>> for the purpose.
>>>
>>> Should I use an EUT for site comparison?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Grace Lin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>>> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
>>> e-mail to <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
>>> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>>> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
>>> URL.
>>>
>>> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>>> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>>
>>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>>> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
>>> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>>> Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
>>> David Heald <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>> This email has been scanned for SPAM content and Viruses by the MessageL
>>> abs Email Security System.
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>>> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
>>> e-mail to <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at
>>> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>>> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
>>> URL.
>>>
>>> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>>> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>>
>>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>>> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
>>> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>>> Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
>>> David Heald <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>>>       
> emc-pstc
>   
>>> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
>>> <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>>> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>>> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
>>> URL.
>>>
>>> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>>> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>>
>>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>>> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
>>> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>>> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
>>> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
>>     
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
> <[email protected]>
>   
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
>>     
> URL.
>   
>> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
>> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>>
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
>> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>     
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
> <[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that
> URL.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.
>
> Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
> David Heald: <[email protected]>
>
>   

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to