In message <5ee25f4c3567f748871d74829b84dd9d04372...@tk5ex14mbxc133.redmond.corp.mic rosoft.com>, dated Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Ted Eckert <[email protected]> writes:
>There is clearly an increased risk, but there is little conclusive data >on the magnitude of that risk. I don't think there ever can be. The number of different products is huge and ever-changing, and it's necessary to take into account that a product might be faulty and emitting far more than it is supposed to. I have measured 3 V peak-to-peak of 50 MHz across the neck loop of a faulty cellphone accessory intended for communication with hearing aids by baseband audio magnetic induction, a function it still performed but with a bit more distortion than normal. Cracked SMD capacitor on the positive supply rail. So 'deactivate' (which includes 'switch off' and any other way to deactivate) and 'stow'. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
