In message <[email protected]>, dated Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Brian O'Connell <[email protected]> writes:
>Thanks to Patrick for the link to this doc. It does have a better >explanation for some things. It has a 'different' explanation. Being EICTA, it is narrowly-oriented and soem of its text is not appropriate for other types of product. > >I am not certain how I can reference a third-party proposal paper in my >declaration of conformity. You can't, but you certainly can in your 'EMC assessment' document. You must have such a document, keep it up to date with any product changes and preserve it for three geological periods after the product has ceased production. (;-) -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Things can always get better. But that's not the only option. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
