Hi Scott,

 

The unit of outside size in that formula is in Liters, a volumetric quantity, 
although it is not adequately described as such below. And as stated below, the 
outside size pertains to a unit cell. For a battery pack that contains multiple 
cells, Volume Energy Density (VED) of each individual cell should be accounted 
for. And, John is correct that small coin cells have quite high VEDs.

 

Also, VED calculators are available online if you would need them and an 
excellent battery summary page can be found at 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battery_sizes for many battery types. But 
for specific batteries, please consult the respective manufacturer’s datasheet.

 

IHTH.

 

Best regards,

 

Ron Pickard

RPQ Consulting

Glendale, AZ 85303

+623.512-3451 tel, +623.848-9033 fax

[email protected]

www.rpqconsulting.com <http://www.rpqconsulting.com/> 

www.linkedin.com/in/RonPickard

 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Xe
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 10:58 PM
To: 'Tyra, John'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: How to determine if battery-operated product is safe or not

 

Hi John,

 

Many thanks  for your detail info.  Regarding the outside size, does it

refer to the outside size of battery pack (for example of laptop battery

pack, it may contain multiple cells (i.e. 18650 cells) in series or parallel

or both) or the total size of cells?  What is the unit in size?

 

Thanks,

 

Scott

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tyra, John

Sent: 2009年7月11日 2:17

To: 'Scott Xe'; [email protected]

Subject: RE: How to determine if battery-operated product is safe or not

 

Hello Scott,

 

Here are the Energy Density equations sent to me by METI in Japan 

 

1. We recommend to make sure the energy density by obtaining the design from

the battery manufacture because it should be considered necessarily at the

design phase by them. Please refer to the following formula and it is

subjected to the regulation if volume energy density is over 400Wh/L.

 

Volume Energy Density = ( Rated Capacity * Rated Voltage ) / Outside Size

 

Rated Capacity: The battery capacity C5Ah (ampere-hour) specified by the

battery manufacture.

The battery capacity C5Ah means it can supply for five hours when the

battery is charged, stored and discharged under the condition of JIS C8711

(2006)7.2.1. Please refer to "JIS C8711(2006) 3.5". The discharge stop

voltage is specified by the battery manufacture.

Rated Voltage: The appropriate voltage. It is used for specifying or

identifying the voltage of a unit battery.

Generally it is five-hour discharge rate and the average discharge voltage

when measuring the rated capacity Outside Size: the outside size for a unit

cell. Please refer to the following website in detail. Unfortunately it is

Japanese only.

http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/consumer/seian/denan/kaishaku/haninokaishaku.pd

f

 

2. The battery pack which is more than 400Wh/l per one single cell is

subjected to Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Act and it needs to be

put the circle PSE mark. With in B to B contract it is enough to label the

PSE mark either before import or after import. The importers in Japan are

responsible to it.

 

Hope this helps,

 

 

John Tyra

Manager Product Safety Group

Bose Corporation

The Mountain, MS-450

Framingham, MA 01701-9168

phone: 508-766-1502

fax: 508-766-1145

 

 

 

 



From: Scott Xe [mailto:[email protected]] 

Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 12:43 PM

To: Tyra, John; [email protected]

Subject: RE: How to determine if battery-operated product is safe or not

 

Hi John,

 

Thanks for your useful information.

 

The battery is of soldered connection type lithium 3.7 V 180 mAh which is a

low power so we need to make a sensible judgement if it really needs to do

any LVD test.  Is there any formula to convert the given spec to power

density?

 

Thanks,

 

Scott

 



From: Tyra, John [mailto:[email protected]] 

Sent: 2009年7月10日 1:05

To: 'Scott Xe'; [email protected]

Subject: RE: How to determine if battery-operated product is safe or not

 

Hello Scott,

 

You did not mention the type of battery you are using but I am guessing it

is Lithium Ion??

 

In this case I don't think there really is any easy way to guarantee safety

of a rechargeable Lithium Ion battery pack without extensive testing to

current International Standards. Just an FYI the International Regulatory

bodies are in the process of revising the current standards to try to make

them more stringent due to concerns related to recent field issues.

 

In addition to the UL standards you mentioned I would look at the IEC/EN

requirements such as IEC/EN62133. I don't believe there is a energy limit in

the UL or IEC/EN standards for required compliance.

 

Japan (implemented in November 20, 2008) and Korea (effective January 1,

2010) have also passed new laws regulating Lithium Batteries where any

battery which has an energy density greater than 400W/L must meet specific

construction and test requirements. Batteries below this energy density

level are exempt. Korean requirements are similar to Japan's

 

Here are the links for the Japan regs

 

http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/consumer/seian/denan/lithium/080703/law.pdf

http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/consumer/seian/denan/lithium/080703/cabinet_ord

er.pdf

http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/consumer/seian/denan/lithium/080703/ministerial

_ordinance.pdf

http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/consumer/seian/denan/lithium/080703/technical_r

equirements.pdf

 

There are also International shipping regulations which have energy level

limits and testing requirements. The manufacturer of the cell should be able

to provide you with an appropriate test report. To satisfy the testing

requirements for the shipping regs.

 

http://www.iata.org/nr/rdonlyres/480246b4-c9a3-4e19-aa94-38ae5472ddf4/0/guid

ancedocumentonthetransportoflibatt_2009v21.pdf

 

Hope this helps....

 

Regards,

 

 

John Tyra

Manager Product Safety Group

Bose Corporation

The Mountain, MS-450

Framingham, MA 01701-9168

phone: 508-766-1502

fax: 508-766-1145

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Xe

Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:38 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: How to determine if battery-operated product is safe or not

 

We have an USB rechargeable battery-operated video clip/MP3 player.  As

battery-operated products do not fall into LVD directive, what can we apply

the basis to determine the product safe or not?  Looking at historical

safety hazard reports on the market, there was not much any recall on this

type of products except the explosion of rechargeable battery pack.

However, the possible explosion of rechargeable battery pack cannot be

picked up by LVD directive or dedicated UL1642/2054 battery cell/pack

standards.  Otherwise, Sony did not need to recall millions of battery packs

and the said standards are not required the review.  What is potential

hazard do we need to look at this type of products? As the safety hazard is

tied with power energy, is there any reference that there is no safety

concern if the power energy is below certain level?

 

Thanks,

 

Scott

 

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc

discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to

<[email protected]>

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that

URL.

 

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas <[email protected]>

Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>

David Heald: <[email protected]>

 

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc

discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to

<[email protected]>

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that

URL.

 

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas <[email protected]>

Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>

David Heald: <[email protected]>

 

-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

 

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

Scott Douglas <[email protected]>

Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

 

For policy questions, send mail to:

Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>

David Heald: <[email protected]>

 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at 
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL. 

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]> 


Reply via email to