In message <[email protected]>,
dated Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Bill Owsley <[email protected]> writes:
Thus, the received voltage received via a direct path added with a
reflected path, assuming no distance or reflection loss, would be 6 dB
higher than the direct path alone. This direct path alone is the
assumed field measured in a FAC, neglecting any chamber anomalies.
Or is it 3 dB higher?? as in power?
If the direct and reflected rays are equal amplitude and in phase, then
it's +6 dB; if they are at 180 degrees, it's minus infinity dB. In
between you can get any value, depending on relative phase and
transmission loss.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Some people who are peeling the finch of the financial crisis are thinking of
biting a rook.
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
