In message
<of41dc1b7b.47d772a4-on802579a5.00361540-802579a5.0038f...@servomex.com>,
dated Wed, 15 Feb 2012, [email protected] writes:
Given that no power cable or cable gland is shipped with the product,
for the equipment to be approved under IEC/EN 61010-1 Ed.3 are the
requirements of Clause 6.10.2.2 Cord anchorage applicable?
It could be argued that the product is not 'finished goods', so
responsibility for assuring safety and applying the CE mark would
devolve on to the installer, who is in fact performing the final
manufacturing stage. This argument is not new; it has been raised by
compliance authorities in the past, in the same context.
Do you really have to do this? It seems to me like a minefield.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
If 'QWERTY' is an English keyboard, what language is 'WYSIWYG' for?
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>