This is incorrect. This approach was permitted by 98/37/EC but 2006/42/EC no longer permits this kind of analysis.
Regards Nick. On 30 Apr 2012, at 18:33, Peter Merguerian wrote: > Mark, > > You need to do a comprehensive risk assessment and determine if the risk of > injury to persons using or servicing the equipment is more mechanical or > more electrical. You may have a moving part that is inside the equipment and > inaccessible. How fast is that moving part? How is it secured? Is it > accessible to a service person? Can the interlock of access doors be > defeated? Lots and lots of questions that your engineering team need to ask > before deciding which Directive must be applied. > > - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <emcp...@radiusnorth.net> Mike Cantwell <mcantw...@ieee.org> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <j.bac...@ieee.org> David Heald: <dhe...@gmail.com>
