James

It is to account for the lack of ground plane with its potential +6dB effect 
due to reflection found during height scanning

The FCC have already considered this in KDB558074 when allowing conducted 
spurious emissions measurements to be performed in lieu of radiated ones for 
some unlicensed transmitters, however, the FCC requirements are:

3. Add appropriate factor to model worst-case ground reflections
For emissions < 30 MHz, add a factor of 6.0 dB;
For emissions > 30 MHz and < 1000 MHz, add a factor of 4.7 dB.

Regards
Charlie

From: Pawson, James [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 16 October 2012 15:27
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] OATS vs FAR Radiated Emissions Limits


We've just received EN 61000-6-3:2007 + A1:2011 which has added the ability to 
test radiated emissions in either an OATS, Fully Anechoic Room (FAR) or TEM 
waveguide.

What puzzled me is the limits for the FAR @ 3m:

        30MHz ~ 230MHz: 42 to 35dBuV decreasing linearly with the log of the 
frequency
        230MHz ~ 1GHz: 42dBuV

Checking a draft version of CISPR 32 also shows these same limits for an FAR.

These limits are lower than those for an OATS at 3m. Does anyone know why the 
limits are lower and of a different characteristic? I'm guessing something to 
do with the lack of reflective ground plane in the FAR.

Does anyone have any further information?

Many thanks
James

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
James Pawson
Leading Hardware Engineer - EMC
EchoStar Europe


-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to