In message
<[email protected]>, dated
Tue, 16 Oct 2012, "Pawson, James" <[email protected]> writes:
These limits are lower than those for an OATS at 3m. Does anyone know
why the limits are lower and of a different characteristic? I'm
guessing something to do with the lack of reflective ground plane in
the FAR.
In principle, an attempt has been made to reconcile the limits
applicable to the different measurement environments so that products
with given emission levels produce at least similar test results (dB
above or, preferably, below the limit) in each environment.
The deliberations that resulted in these limits were long and very
complex.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
